Відео

And conservative can be worse on a lot of issues.

😩🤦🏽‍♀️🤌🏽💯

Okay brute.

Hola, te recomiendo mantenerte al pendiente del sitio web del Instituto Kroc más o menos en Mayo 2023, cuando probablemente saldrá la siguiente convocatoria (ahorita estamos ya en el proceso de selección de los que aplicaron este año).

There is a live chat (not top chat) replay. Some of the comments came in to the live broadcast just as people signed off after concluded. There were also maybe a few comments that were not questions nor were they productive - more so ethnocentric, generalizing based on anti-immigrant sentiment and trying to discuss macro politics. Host said in the beginning the q&a was dependent on time constraint. And with so many comments, they'd have more work in piecing out or narrowing actual questions.

Viewer has to be patient with the replay chat, it will eventually display.

@john, have had a chance to read your comment, just another viewer like iI think you may be. I think your concern emphasizes the importance of acculturation where adjudicated asylees would have access to english education, be able to build skills and fulfill all the untapped potential that they may have been unable to, due to being under the thumb of violence and perpetual physical threat and resulting extortion and toxic stress. English acquisition is incredibly short for middle aged or young immigrants and is a desire and key to success, so no reason to make life harder or punitive to those who are here, to not offer multi-language or ESL. As far as competition, we see our politicians now studying how to re-skill and replace US born citizen workers from certain dying industries to new industries and also, how to reinvent those industries. The number one problem vocationally and barrier to employment as relayed by those who hire, is that the candidate pool is not skilled enough. There is no reason in my mind to think non-immigrants don't hold an inherent advantage in broadening skills over those adopting a new country. And of course, there are all type of asylees and some that can use their experience or position in originating home country to fill a niche in the US. I think your concerns go back to how immigration is good for us. And you're right, there was an actual study done on the negative knee-jerk physical visceral reaction of a small group of white american people to hearing non-english languages spoken around them, and how that triggers intolerance. My experience living in a diverse area of the US is very different than that, and I've found increased exposure to more cultures makes receiving of more new groups essential.. in retaining my feeling of and benefits of living among diversity. That I personally enjoy. Even if you take a traditional republican conservative view, low skilled labor will never be obsolete, one being farm labor where the abuses are great. We've got a social security crises (pandemic and recession influence on this not really known yet) that only young workers and new workers can help to solve. We've also got the problem of sustaining recruits in the military to a minimum level with where the young people are today and population, as well as traits of millennials and gen z. And some newly minted US Citizens are enthusiastically allegiant and want join the military. We know many undocumented people who have lived the full american experience and have that identity, are honorable veterans and been deported. Entitlements and privileges aren't extended to the degree people assume when spreading myths, but even if they are, those things in my mind, are all in the US born citizens' interests as far as financial solvency of hospitals, public heath, safety on the road, education and acculturation, etc. This stuff is just fundamental, like the basics. It's not like anyone is going to get rich off it. I see all that as being good for you and me, and all the us born citizen children, republican or dem in schools. Not to mention all of the offsetting eb-5 visa immigrant investor capital and revenue that can be redeployed in the budget to economic recovery projects, and immigrant business and immigrant worker tax, documented or not. These are all things that should resonate with republican fiscal values, family values, and religious values in honoring humanity and helping the least of us. So it depends on systematic whole-systems thinking or direct-limited cause-effect thinking. I think the tribalism thing can only be cured and solved by agreeing that asylum should be a humane process. Deterrents don't work and come at a cost of our own humanity. Also, the solution is to help people see that they really have no enemies in immigrants, like asylees are not the enemy and not the cause of everyone's decreased success or career damage. And coming to terms with the fact that there is not a hierarchy where US born citizens can relegate immigrants to unskilled work by being prioritized, and avoid them from applying for the same job. I mean government systematically does this enough with the way migrants are treated or lack opportunity and resources. And asking the question of whether or not that really happens on a personal level or if that is true competition? I mean we are supposed to be equal, right? And treated equal, right? Whose to say one's life is more valuable than another life when it comes to migrant deaths. So if we are always working from that question of how we can make it a non-negotiable humane process, and then work on other policy solutions form there. Like fixing the court capacity and efficiency, anti-corruption locality police partnerships with experts from other countries and police training work in central america that has been shown to work in keeping people safe and allowing small-scale sufficiency projects to survive. And from the conservative view, when it all shakes out in the end, there is most likely a net benefit.

First of all you are making completely baseless prejudicial assumptions about a complete stranger. Those are EXACTLY the same tactics used by sexists, transphobes and racists. Are you yourself an ethno-nation*list and/or a r*cist? ..It would explain a lot.

Second of all your entire prolix comment is full of special pleading, appeals to emotion and anecdotal evidence. Nothing backed with any evidence or data, nor occupying any basis in fact.